Crypto license cost comparison by country: Licence Fee Table

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through the estate's fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 20 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 18 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 4 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in GBP (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 33 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

Derivation as chartered: one row per regime per fee, each read from the authority's own fee instrument with its currency and effective date, then NORMALISED - application fee and first-year supervision fee converted to one currency on a dated rate, and the per-activity multipliers (VARA charges per VA activity, Malta by service class, Cyprus a fixed plus a turnover-linked variable) expanded into what a named business model actually pays.

That comparison is the thing no regulator publishes and every adviser publishes differently: the ranked table of what the STATE charges, separated from what an adviser charges, with the regimes that publish no fee at all marked as such rather than dropped

33 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.